2026 Nevada Revised StatutesChapter 38 – Mediation And ArbitrationNRS 38.250 Nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in district court required; nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in justice court authorized; effect of certain agreements by parties to use other alternative methods of resolving disputes.

Nevada Revised Statutes
Illustrated graphic of the Nevada State Legislature building with the Senate wing and Nevada state flag, featuring a yellow banner headline that reads NRS 38.250 ARBITRATION OF ACTIONS IN DISTRICT COURTS AND JUSTICE COURTS

Statutory Text

1.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 38.310:

(a) All civil actions filed in district court for damages, if the cause of action arises in the State of Nevada and the amount in issue does not exceed $50,000 per plaintiff, exclusive of attorney’s fees, interest and court costs, must be submitted to nonbinding arbitration in accordance with the provisions of NRS 38.250 to 38.259, inclusive, unless the parties have agreed or are otherwise required to submit the action to an alternative method of resolving disputes established by the Supreme Court pursuant to NRS 38.258, including, without limitation, a settlement conference, mediation or a short trial.

(b) A civil action for damages filed in justice court may be submitted to binding arbitration or to an alternative method of resolving disputes, including, without limitation, a settlement conference or mediation, if the parties agree to the submission.

2.  An agreement entered into pursuant to this section must be:

(a) Entered into at the time of the dispute and not be a part of any previous agreement between the parties;

(b) In writing; and

(c) Entered into knowingly and voluntarily.

Ê An agreement entered into pursuant to this section that does not comply with the requirements set forth in this subsection is void.

3.  As used in this section, “short trial” means a trial that is conducted, with the consent of the parties to the action, in accordance with procedures designed to limit the length of the trial, including, without limitation, restrictions on the amount of discovery requested by each party, the use of a jury composed of not more than eight persons and a specified limit on the amount of time each party may use to present the party’s case.

(Added to NRS by 1991, 1343; A 1993, 556, 1024; 1995, 1419, 2537, 2538; 1999, 852, 1379; 2003, 851; 2005, 391)

NV Rev Stat § 38.250 – Last Verified February 2026

Plain English Explanation

Nevada law requires that certain civil lawsuits go through a process called nonbinding arbitration before they can proceed further in district court. This applies when someone files a lawsuit for money damages, the dispute happened in Nevada, and the amount being sought is $50,000 or less per person suing. The word “nonbinding” is important here because it means neither side is locked into the outcome. They can still take the case to a full trial if they are unhappy with the arbitration result.

Arbitration is basically a simpler, faster way to resolve a dispute outside of a traditional courtroom. Instead of going straight to a judge or jury, the parties present their case to a neutral third party called an arbitrator.

There is an exception to this requirement. If both sides have already agreed to use a different dispute resolution method, like mediation or a settlement conference, they do not have to go through arbitration. The Nevada Supreme Court has set up several of these alternative options under a related law.

For lawsuits filed in justice court rather than district court, arbitration works a little differently. It is not automatic. The parties can choose to go to binding arbitration or try mediation or a settlement conference, but only if both sides agree to it.

If the parties do decide to make their own agreement about how to handle the dispute, that agreement has some strict requirements. It must be made at the time the dispute actually occurs, not buried in some contract they signed before anything went wrong. It also has to be written down, and both parties need to enter into it willingly and with a clear understanding of what they are agreeing to. Any agreement that skips one of these requirements is considered void, meaning it has no legal effect at all.

The law also defines what a “short trial” means in this context. A short trial is a condensed version of a regular trial that both parties consent to. It limits how much evidence gathering each side can do, caps the jury at no more than eight people, and sets a time limit on how long each side gets to argue their case.

Frequently Asked Questions About NRS 38.250

What is the $50,000 limit in NRS 38.250?

Nevada law requires mandatory nonbinding arbitration for civil lawsuits filed in district court when the amount being sought is $50,000 or less per plaintiff.

This dollar amount does not include attorney’s fees, interest, or court costs. If your claim exceeds $50,000, the mandatory arbitration requirement does not apply and your case can proceed directly through the normal court process.

What happens if I disagree with the arbitration result under NRS 38.250?

Because the arbitration required under this law is nonbinding, neither party is forced to accept the outcome. If you are unhappy with the arbitrator’s decision, you have the right to reject it and request a traditional trial. This is one of the key differences between nonbinding and binding arbitration.

Do both parties have to agree to arbitration under NRS 38.250?

For cases filed in district court that meet the dollar threshold, arbitration is automatic and does not require both parties to agree. However, for cases filed in justice court, both sides must mutually agree before the case can be sent to arbitration or any other alternative dispute resolution method.

Can a contract force me into arbitration before a dispute even happens?

No. Under NRS 38.250, any agreement to use an alternative dispute resolution method must be made at the time the dispute actually arises. It cannot be part of a pre-existing contract signed before the disagreement occurred. It also must be in writing and entered into freely by both parties.

What is the difference between mediation and arbitration under this law?

Arbitration involves a neutral third party who listens to both sides and issues a decision, even if that decision is nonbinding. Mediation is a more collaborative process where a neutral mediator helps both parties work toward their own mutually agreed solution. Under NRS 38.250, mediation is one of several alternative options parties can choose instead of going through arbitration, but both sides must agree to it.

If you believe your case may be subject to mandatory arbitration under NRS 38.250, understanding your rights and options before the process begins can make a real difference in the outcome. Speaking with a licensed Nevada attorney can help you figure out the best path forward for your specific situation.

Client Testimonials

We prioritize client satisfaction from the first consultation to the final case resolution. And our Las Vegas personal injury attorneys have earned 5-star client satisfaction, with glowing testimonials from injured clients across Nevada. We prioritize client satisfaction from the first consultation to the final.

Elizabeth Morales Gonzalez
March 13, 2026

Adquirí el servicio del abogado Zachary y de Reyna por un accidente automovilístico ellos me ayudaron con mi accidente y recibí un excelente servicio. Me resolvieron mi caso y quedé muy contenta y satisfecha gracias a su ayuda.
alan orozco
March 13, 2026

Excellent help from Reyna and Zach. They were very informative and made the whole process a lot easier. I can’t express how stress free this whole process has been. Thank you so much for everything
crisali martines
March 13, 2026

I am entirely grateful and so appreciative of the way Woodridge law office handled my case. Reyna was so amazing. The communication with her was always so great and she made sure I was never confused or left in the blind about what was happening with my case. I cannot thank her enough for how well she handled my case. I would give 100 stars if I could.
Luke Hill
March 13, 2026

I’ve had numerous conversations with their team, and I truly appreciate all the guidance they’ve offered about what their injury lawyers are capable of. They’re super supportive and genuinely seem to care, which is refreshing. I haven’t reached out to any other personal injury attorneys in Las Vegas, but I’m confident I made the right decision by connecting with them.
Bertolini The Great
March 13, 2026

I just want to say all across the board the most professional and experienced team by far. Nick, Eduardo, Zachary everyone in the process was so informative and on top of it. If i could repay the favor i would they were by far the best at keeping me informed and at ease took care of my case and helped me free. Thank you gentlemen I know your business will prosper.
Kimberlina Lea
March 13, 2026

First, off this is one of best and genuine law firms! I called in because I was wrongfully profiled and suffered from some prejudice at Walmart, I called in tears and David answered the phone. He was genuine and honest and listened. I am a law student myself and to hear someone actually be genuine and helpful while the other lawyers thought my case was too petty for them. If anyone needs someone who actually cares please call this office and ask for David he will help you connect with the right lawyers in the office!
Jon Tavares
March 13, 2026

I had an excellent experience with Wooldridge Law. They handled my case with the utmost professionalism and efficiency, making the entire process smooth and stress-free. Their expertise and dedication were evident every step of the way, and I am beyond satisfied with the outcome. I truly could not recommend them more highly! If you need legal assistance, this is the team to trust.
bob torres
March 13, 2026

I would like highly recommend them also send a special Thank you to Reyna and the team at woolridge law firm they went above and beyond to provide me with an incredible experience with my elevator injury case I’m from out of state they made my case very easy to deal with over the phone and emails issue free very professional always kept me informed made me feel comfortable throughout the process I’m thrilled with the outcome. I would also like to send a special Thank you to Reyna her professionalism and knowledge were top notch she kept me updated throughout the process,which I really appreciated. Highly recommend them!
Results & track record

Nevada

born and bred

Trusted

and reviewed

99.9%

satisfaction

Proven
trial lawyers

Awards & Associations

Award 10Award 9Award 8Award 7Award 6Award 5Award 4Award 3Award 2Award 1