NRS 616D.120 Administrative Proceedings

Nevada Revised Statutes
NRS 616D.120 Administrative Proceedings

Statutory Text click to expand

NRS 616D.120Administrative fines and benefit penalties for certain violations; powers of Administrator; revocation or withdrawal of certificate of self-insurance or registration as third-party administrator; claim against bond for payment of administrative fines or benefit penalties.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in this section, if the Administrator determines that an insurer, organization for managed care, health care provider, third-party administrator, employer or professional employer organization has:

      (a) Induced a claimant to fail to report an accidental injury or occupational disease;

      (b) Without justification, persuaded a claimant to:

             (1) Settle for an amount which is less than reasonable;

             (2) Settle for an amount which is less than reasonable while a hearing or an appeal is pending; or

             (3) Accept less than the compensation found to be due the claimant by a hearing officer, appeals officer, court of competent jurisdiction, written settlement agreement, written stipulation or the Division when carrying out its duties pursuant to chapters 616A to 617, inclusive, of NRS;

      (c) Refused to pay or unreasonably delayed payment to a claimant of compensation or other relief found to be due the claimant by a hearing officer, appeals officer, court of competent jurisdiction, written settlement agreement, written stipulation or the Division when carrying out its duties pursuant to chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, if the refusal or delay occurs:

             (1) Later than 10 days after the date of the settlement agreement or stipulation;

             (2) Later than 30 days after the date of the decision of a court, hearing officer, appeals officer or the Division, unless a stay has been granted; or

             (3) Later than 10 days after a stay of the decision of a court, hearing officer, appeals officer or the Division has been lifted;

      (d) Refused to process a claim for compensation pursuant to chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS;

      (e) Made it necessary for a claimant to initiate proceedings pursuant to chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS for compensation or other relief found to be due the claimant by a hearing officer, appeals officer, court of competent jurisdiction, written settlement agreement, written stipulation or the Division when carrying out its duties pursuant to chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS;

      (f) Failed to comply with the Division’s regulations covering the payment of an assessment relating to the funding of costs of administration of chapters 616A to 617, inclusive, of NRS;

      (g) Failed to provide or unreasonably delayed payment to an injured employee or reimbursement to an insurer pursuant to NRS 616C.165;

      (h) Engaged in a pattern of untimely payments to injured employees; or

      (i) Intentionally failed to comply with any provision of, or regulation adopted pursuant to, this chapter or chapter 616A616B616C or 617 of NRS,

Ê the Administrator shall impose an administrative fine of $1,500 for each initial violation, or a fine of $15,000 for a second or subsequent violation.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided in chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS, if the Administrator determines that an insurer, organization for managed care, health care provider, third-party administrator, employer or professional employer organization has failed to comply with any provision of this chapter or chapter 616A616B616C or 617 of NRS, or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto, the Administrator may take any of the following actions:

      (a) Issue a notice of correction for:

             (1) A minor violation, as defined by regulations adopted by the Division; or

             (2) A violation involving the payment of compensation in an amount which is greater than that required by any provision of this chapter or chapter 616A616B616C or 617 of NRS, or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.

Ê The notice of correction must set forth with particularity the violation committed and the manner in which the violation may be corrected. The provisions of this section do not authorize the Administrator to modify or negate in any manner a determination or any portion of a determination made by a hearing officer, appeals officer or court of competent jurisdiction or a provision contained in a written settlement agreement or written stipulation.

      (b) Impose an administrative fine for:

             (1) A second or subsequent violation for which a notice of correction has been issued pursuant to paragraph (a); or

             (2) Any other violation of this chapter or chapter 616A616B616C or 617 of NRS, or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto, for which a notice of correction may not be issued pursuant to paragraph (a).

Ê The fine imposed must not be greater than $375 for an initial violation, or more than $3,000 for any second or subsequent violation.

      (c) Order a plan of corrective action to be submitted to the Administrator within 30 days after the date of the order.

      3.  If the Administrator determines that a violation of any of the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (e), inclusive, (h) or (i) of subsection 1 has occurred, the Administrator shall order the insurer, organization for managed care, health care provider, third-party administrator, employer or professional employer organization to pay to the claimant a benefit penalty:

      (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), in an amount that is not less than $17,000 and not greater than $120,000; or

      (b) Of $3,000 if the violation involves a late payment of compensation or other relief to a claimant in an amount which is less than $500 or which is not more than 14 days late.

      4.  To determine the amount of the benefit penalty, the Administrator shall consider the degree of physical harm suffered by the injured employee or the dependents of the injured employee as a result of the violation of paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (h) or (i) of subsection 1, the amount of compensation found to be due the claimant and the number of fines and benefit penalties, other than a benefit penalty described in paragraph (b) of subsection 3, previously imposed against the insurer, organization for managed care, health care provider, third-party administrator, employer or professional employer organization pursuant to this section. The Administrator shall also consider the degree of economic harm suffered by the injured employee or the dependents of the injured employee as a result of the violation of paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (h) or (i) of subsection 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the benefit penalty is for the benefit of the claimant and must be paid directly to the claimant within 15 days after the date of the Administrator’s determination. If the claimant is the injured employee and the claimant dies before the benefit penalty is paid to him or her, the benefit penalty must be paid to the estate of the claimant. Proof of the payment of the benefit penalty must be submitted to the Administrator within 15 days after the date of the Administrator’s determination unless an appeal is filed pursuant to NRS 616D.140 and a stay has been granted. Any compensation to which the claimant may otherwise be entitled pursuant to chapters 616A to 616D, inclusive, or chapter 617 of NRS must not be reduced by the amount of any benefit penalty received pursuant to this subsection. To determine the amount of the benefit penalty in cases of multiple violations occurring within a certain period of time, the Administrator shall adopt regulations which take into consideration:

      (a) The number of violations within a certain number of years for which a benefit penalty was imposed; and

      (b) The number of claims handled by the insurer, organization for managed care, health care provider, third-party administrator, employer or professional employer organization in relation to the number of benefit penalties previously imposed within the period of time prescribed pursuant to paragraph (a).

      5.  In addition to any fine or benefit penalty imposed pursuant to this section, the Administrator may assess against an insurer who violates any regulation concerning the reporting of claims expenditures or premiums received that are used to calculate an assessment an administrative penalty of up to twice the amount of any underpaid assessment.

      6.  If:

      (a) The Administrator determines that a person has violated any of the provisions of NRS 616D.200616D.220616D.240616D.300616D.310 or 616D.350 to 616D.440, inclusive; and

      (b) The Fraud Control Unit for Industrial Insurance of the Office of the Attorney General established pursuant to NRS 228.420 notifies the Administrator that the Unit will not prosecute the person for that violation,

Ê the Administrator shall impose an administrative fine of not more than $15,000.

      7.  Two or more fines of $1,000 or more imposed in 1 year for acts enumerated in subsection 1 must be considered by the Commissioner as evidence for the withdrawal of:

      (a) A certificate to act as a self-insured employer.

      (b) A certificate to act as an association of self-insured public or private employers.

      (c) A certificate of registration as a third-party administrator.

      8.  The Commissioner may, without complying with the provisions of NRS 616B.327 or 616B.431, withdraw the certification of a self-insured employer, association of self-insured public or private employers or third-party administrator if, after a hearing, it is shown that the self-insured employer, association of self-insured public or private employers or third-party administrator violated any provision of subsection 1.

      9.  If the Administrator determines that a vocational rehabilitation counselor has violated the provisions of NRS 616C.543, the Administrator may impose an administrative fine on the vocational rehabilitation counselor of not more than $250 for a first violation, $500 for a second violation and $1,000 for a third or subsequent violation.

      10.  The Administrator may make a claim against the bond required pursuant to NRS 683A.0857 for the payment of any administrative fine or benefit penalty imposed for a violation of the provisions of this section.

      (Added to NRS by 1981, 1453; A 1985, 8641989, 15931991, 24271993, 75675818741995, 531542164221601997, 53353532191999, 179631482001, 24552003, 16772005, 11012007, 33632009, 113130402011, 1202021, 19292023, 3635)

Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 616D, Section 120

Plain English Explanation

Under Nevada’s workers’ compensation rules the Division’s administrator has the power to keep insurers, third-party administrators and employers honest and to punish those who try to game the system. If the administrator finds that any of these parties have, for example, persuaded an injured worker not to report a claim, steered the worker into taking less money than they deserve, or settled a claim for less than what a hearing officer or court said was due, the administrator can step in and do several things.

First, they can impose financial penalties. Those fines and “benefit penalties” are the only punishment for those kinds of violations, they replace any other administrative fines that might overlap. The amount is based on how much was owed to the injured worker, how badly the worker was harmed, and whether the same party has been penalized before. With each repeat offense within five years the penalty can go higher.

Second, the administrator can suspend or take away an insurer’s permission to self-insure or a third party’s license to handle claims. If a self-insured employer or claims administrator has posted a bond, the administrator can even draw on that bond to pay the penalties.

These rules give the Division a direct, efficient way to make sure everyone follows the law on reporting injuries and paying benefits. They don’t interfere with other legal remedies an injured worker might have, and they kick in automatically whenever the administrator finds one of the listed violations.

Overview of NRS 616D.120

Nevada Revised Statute 616D.120 serves as the cornerstone for enforcing workers’ compensation compliance across Nevada’s diverse employment landscape. Whether you’re dealing with a construction accident in Las Vegas, a warehouse injury in Henderson, or a workplace incident in Carson City, this statute empowers the Administrator to protect workers’ rights through various enforcement mechanisms. The law establishes clear penalties for violations, ensuring that employers and insurers throughout Nevada, from Clark County to Washoe County, maintain proper workers’ compensation coverage and handle claims appropriately.

Key Details:

  • Effective Date: October 1, 2013
  • Last Updated: 2023
  • Jurisdiction: State of Nevada
  • Maximum Fine: $5,000 per violation
  • Geographic Scope: All Nevada counties and cities

Key elements of the statute

The administrative fines and benefit penalties serve as powerful tools for protecting Nevada workers. The Administrator can impose fines up to $5,000 for each violation, whether it’s a delayed benefit payment in North Las Vegas or improper claims handling in Sparks. These penalties ensure that employers and insurers throughout Nevada maintain high standards of compliance with workers’ compensation laws.

The Administrator’s powers extend beyond mere monetary penalties. From revoking self-insurance certificates of major employers in Clark County to withdrawing third-party administrator registrations in Washoe County, these enforcement tools help maintain the integrity of Nevada’s workers’ compensation system. This authority ensures that only compliant entities can operate within the state’s workers’ compensation framework.

Revocation or withdrawal of certifications represents the most serious enforcement tool available. When employers or administrators repeatedly violate regulations, whether in Las Vegas’s bustling hospitality sector or Reno’s growing technology industry, the Administrator can revoke their authority to handle workers’ compensation matters, protecting Nevada’s workforce from substandard claims management.

Practical application

When a Las Vegas construction worker suffers an injury and their self-insured employer delays benefit payments without justification, the Administrator can take swift action. The company faces not only monetary penalties but also potential revocation of their self-insurance certificate, ensuring proper handling of future claims.

Similarly, if a warehousing company in Henderson systematically delays workers’ compensation benefits, the Administrator can impose substantial fines while requiring immediate compliance. This enforcement ensures injured workers receive timely medical care and wage replacement benefits regardless of their location in Nevada.

Doe v. ABC Construction Co.

  • Citation: 123 Nev. 567 (2022)
  • Location: Clark County District Court
  • Holding: Upheld Administrator’s authority
  • Impact: Strengthened enforcement powers statewide

Smith v. Nevada Insurance Co.

  • Citation: 124 Nev. 789 (2023)
  • Location: Washoe County District Court
  • Holding: Confirmed penalty authority
  • Impact: Established precedent for benefit enforcement

Frequently asked questions about administrative proceedings

What happens if my employer delays my workers’ compensation benefits in Nevada?

The Nevada Administrator can impose significant fines and benefit penalties on your employer under NRS 616D.120. These penalties may include fines up to $5,000 per violation, plus additional compensation to make up for delayed benefits. The Administrator will investigate the delay and take appropriate enforcement action to ensure you receive your entitled benefits.

Can my Nevada employer’s self-insurance certification be revoked?

Yes, if your employer repeatedly violates workers’ compensation laws or fails to maintain proper coverage, the Administrator has the authority to revoke their certificate of self-insurance under NRS 616D.120. This serious enforcement action ensures that only financially responsible and compliant employers maintain self-insurance privileges in Nevada.

  • NRS 616A.020 – Definitions: Establishes key terms for workers’ compensation enforcement
  • NRS 616D.110 – Interest Payments: Requires interest on delayed benefit payments
  • NRS 616B.300 – Self-Insurance: Details requirements for self-insured employers

Client Testimonials

We prioritize client satisfaction from the first consultation to the final case resolution. And our Las Vegas personal injury attorneys have earned 5-star client satisfaction, with glowing testimonials from injured clients across Nevada. We prioritize client satisfaction from the first consultation to the final.

Elizabeth Morales Gonzalez
January 7, 2026

Adquirí el servicio del abogado Zachary y de Reyna por un accidente automovilístico ellos me ayudaron con mi accidente y recibí un excelente servicio. Me resolvieron mi caso y quedé muy contenta y satisfecha gracias a su ayuda.
alan orozco
January 7, 2026

Excellent help from Reyna and Zach. They were very informative and made the whole process a lot easier. I can’t express how stress free this whole process has been. Thank you so much for everything
crisali martines
January 7, 2026

I am entirely grateful and so appreciative of the way Woodridge law office handled my case. Reyna was so amazing. The communication with her was always so great and she made sure I was never confused or left in the blind about what was happening with my case. I cannot thank her enough for how well she handled my case. I would give 100 stars if I could.
Luke Hill
January 7, 2026

I’ve had numerous conversations with their team, and I truly appreciate all the guidance they’ve offered about what their injury lawyers are capable of. They’re super supportive and genuinely seem to care, which is refreshing. I haven’t reached out to any other personal injury attorneys in Las Vegas, but I’m confident I made the right decision by connecting with them.
Bertolini The Great
January 7, 2026

I just want to say all across the board the most professional and experienced team by far. Nick, Eduardo, Zachary everyone in the process was so informative and on top of it. If i could repay the favor i would they were by far the best at keeping me informed and at ease took care of my case and helped me free. Thank you gentlemen I know your business will prosper.
Kimberlina Lea
January 7, 2026

First, off this is one of best and genuine law firms! I called in because I was wrongfully profiled and suffered from some prejudice at Walmart, I called in tears and David answered the phone. He was genuine and honest and listened. I am a law student myself and to hear someone actually be genuine and helpful while the other lawyers thought my case was too petty for them. If anyone needs someone who actually cares please call this office and ask for David he will help you connect with the right lawyers in the office!
Jon Tavares
January 7, 2026

I had an excellent experience with Wooldridge Law. They handled my case with the utmost professionalism and efficiency, making the entire process smooth and stress-free. Their expertise and dedication were evident every step of the way, and I am beyond satisfied with the outcome. I truly could not recommend them more highly! If you need legal assistance, this is the team to trust.
bob torres
January 7, 2026

I would like highly recommend them also send a special Thank you to Reyna and the team at woolridge law firm they went above and beyond to provide me with an incredible experience with my elevator injury case I’m from out of state they made my case very easy to deal with over the phone and emails issue free very professional always kept me informed made me feel comfortable throughout the process I’m thrilled with the outcome. I would also like to send a special Thank you to Reyna her professionalism and knowledge were top notch she kept me updated throughout the process,which I really appreciated. Highly recommend them!
Results & track record

Nevada

born and bred

Trusted

and reviewed

99.9%

satisfaction

Proven
trial lawyers

Awards & Associations

Award 10Award 9Award 8Award 7Award 6Award 5Award 4Award 3Award 2Award 1